The Welney WebsiteProposed Welney-Christchurch Sewage schemepage created & first posted 10th Oct 2007; last updated Tuesday, 18 November 2014 |
||||
|
||||
|
INTRODUCTIONIn 2007 Anglian Water Services proposed the construction of a Sewage Treatment Works on the north side of the Old Croft River at Tipps End as part of their plan to provide first-time sewerage for the villages of Welney and Christchurch.This report was originally posted as a personal view by the Welney Webmaster, Peter Cox, a resident of Tipps End. I tried to bring together as much information and as many facts as I and other residents could establish to allow residents to come to their own conclusions. Views expressed were entirely my own (unless clearly stated otherwise) and did not necessarily represent those of any group or other individuals. I tried to be impartial but if I failed it is probably because I was not overjoyed at the prospect of having a four acre sewage works, for the benefit of other people miles away, thrust into the open landscape just 500 yards from home. |
|
||
Public AwarenessThe general public in Tipps End and Lakes End, on both sides of the county/borough/parish borders were unaware of the proposal until an eagle-eyed Tipps End resident (Ann Wood, late of the Old Chapel) spotted a small Public Notice in the "Fenland Citizen" issued by the Environment Agency (EA) advising that Anglian Water Services Ltd (AWS) had applied for consent to discharge treated sewage effluent into the Old Croft River.Many residents were aware that a first-time-sewerage scheme for Welney and Christchurch has been talked of since at least 2001, and some may have heard that works were due to start in 2008; but the proposed location of the treatment works had not been made generally known. I believe many assumed it would be in the vast open space to the north-west of Tipps End. |
||||
The proposed schemeThe application was to discharge treated sewage effluent from a proposed reservoir (which AW called a treatment works) into the Old Croft River at grid reference TL 5127 9521 near what is locally known as Moden's Drove.location of discharge point and probable site of lagoons/"treatment works" 10th October 2007. Looking west along the Old Croft River from the track ("Moden's Drove") off March Road almost opposite Laburnham Cottage. Partially treated effluent would be discharged into the river about 50m along on the right. The river was covered in algae at the time and and no flow was perceptible. (Photo: Peter Cox) The following volumes & flow rates were quoted:
|
||||
a similar twin-lagoon scheme at Errol in Scotland |
The proposed works were
|
|||
ChronologyFor the record, the chronology was:
|
||||
The Action GroupAs you can see above, the group took their concerns to the Welney Parish Council. The attitude of the Council led the Group to decide to pursue the matter further themselves. The Group therefore invited officers from AWS and EA to meet them at Tipps End on Friday 11th October. Mr Adam Basham for the EA explained the legal and consultation processes involved. Mr John Falcon (?), for AWS described their legal responsibility to provide sewerage for Welney & Christchurch, and the process they had gone through to find suitable land that was available to them. Both answered a variety of questions. The officers then took the Group to see where the discharge point and Treatment Works would be if consent and planning permission were granted. The condition of the Old Croft River (stagnant and static) was noted. See photos. The officers also kindly agreed to attend the second public meeting convened by the Group, to be held on Monday 15th October at 8pm in Welney Parish Hall. The Action Group were very grateful to the officers concerned for their time and courtesy. |
||||
Residents ConcernsMany concerns were raised by those attending the Action Group's first public meeting on Monday 8th October 2007. Some of those were raised again at the next meeting. With regard to the discharge application, some doubted that the Old Croft River had the ability to efficiently disperse large volumes of treated effluent. The river is little more than a stagnant ditch. Flow is virtually nil. The forecast discharge of nearly 100 gallons a minute is likely to stir up years of accumulated stinking sludge that could move back and forth along the river creating a foul stench. One or two thought the river would be scoured clean as a result of the extra input, but as the river doesn't flow much even after heavy rains most felt that was unlikely. With regard to the Treatment Works, there are the obvious worries about smell, visual impact on open countryside, and the possible adverse affect on house prices. Overall, there was a great deal of anger about the apparent lack of consultation. Some felt that the Welney Parish Council or some of its members must have been aware of the proposal and wondered why they did not bring this to our attention and seek our views. Further down this page are extracts from the Councils minutes showing that the Council discussed the Sewerage scheme on many occasions, but there is nothing to suggest they were aware of the proposed treatment site. |
||||
A little more about the schemeRosemary Pratt, Assistant Consents Planner for AWS said “We believe the advantages of the Aerated lagoon system are as follows:
John Falcon from AWS told the Action Group that the scheme was at an "early stage", and the type of works and location were not confirmed. Full plans would not be drawn up until and unless the EA give consent. AWS would then have to apply for planning permission at which time further objections could be made. They were nevertheless fairly confident that work would start in late spring/early summer of 2008. If it went ahead the nearest homes would have been only 400 m (metres) from the works. The AWS officer said that he considered that was a generous distance compared with many other plants, and that there is no legal minimum distance. He told the Group that there would be two rectangular lagoons each 40m x 80m (43 yds by 87 yds), about 4m (13 ft) deep, with 2 m below and 2 m above ground level. That would mean the combined surface area of the two lagoons would be just over 1½ acres, and the whole site could be 3 to 4 acres. On the equipment suppliers website were details of the floating wind-powered aerators used in this type of scheme. They rose nearly 3m above water level, so the tops would be 5m (over 16ft) above ground level. The manufacturers claimed that the design "requires a minimum wind-speed of 4-5 mph 65-75% of the time to solve water problems". When back-up electric motors are used, I understand that noise levels would be about 40 decibels. You can learn much more about the Aero-Fac lagoon system from the the manufacturers own literature: sales brochure, aeration units, and design guidelines. |
||||
How many homes would have been affected?Difficult to say, depends how you define "affected", how effective the treatment plant is at suppressing odours, and how landscaping may soften the visual impact.I estimate that in Tipps End several homes would only be about 220m (240 yards) from the discharge point, 20 homes would be within 500 yards of it, and 56 within half a mile. In addition there are the properties at Lakes End, and along the A1101 Wisbech Road from Welney House to Lakes End. |
||||
Who knew about the proposed site?The Action Group asked Welney Parish Council on 2nd October 2007 if they knew about the proposed sites of discharge and works but apparently they did not.A spokesperson for our local MP Christopher Fraser, said that Mr Fraser was aware of the scheme through his contact with the Council, but I don't know if he knew the exact details. The land owner, Norfolk County Council (NCC) knew because they have apparently indicated they would sell the land to AWS. One would have thought that some of the following would have known officially or heard about the project from their contacts long before AWS submitted their application to the EA. The farmer who rents the land from the NCC. The Welney Parish Council The Kings Lynn & West Norfolk Borough Council The Upwell Internal Drainage Board (whose area includes the Old Croft River). Some members of the Drainage board were also on the District Council (one concerned with planning), another Chairman of the Welney Parish Council and also farmed the land. Yet it seems that none of those good folk had the slightest inkling of what was planned because if they had, surely they would have shared the information with those they represent? |
||||
Extracts from minutes of the Welney Parish Council2006
2007The only references to the sewerage scheme that I found in the WPC minutes from Jan to Aug 2007 were:
Note: The minutes for the meeting on 2nd Oct 2007 would not be available until a few days after the meeting on 1st November 2007! |
||||
Consultee responsesI e-mailed three organisations on 9th October 207 asking if they had been consulted about the discharge application and whether they could issue a statement for inclusion on this site. These are the responses:
"Thank you for your email, which has been forwarded to myself as the Conservation Officer covering this area at the moment. This is a subject which a number of residents at Tipps End have contacted us about with their concerns. Whilst the Environment Agency (EA) is primarily dealing with this case (and I would advise contacting Adam Basham at the EA for further details), it is correct that Natural England were consulted by the EA as to our views on the Discharge License. |
||||
|
Plan "A" withdrawnOn February 14th 2008 the EA confirmed that AWS had withdrawn their application. A new site for the Works has been chosen in the region of grid ref 500954, 1¼ miles further west, with the treated effluent being taken westwards via existing field drains into the Sixteen Foot Drain near Bedlam Bridge. Good news for many residents of Tipps End but some may still find the proposals invasive. |
|
||
back to top of page | comments? please e-mail |